Comparative Crash Data on Cars
Comparative Crash Data on cars
Impact Type
Cars crashed at 35mph into solid barrier. This is the same as a
head-on collision between two identical weight vehicles each doing
35mph (ie, 70mph head-on.) or the same as driving into a parked identical
car at 70mph. Impacting in a small car against a heavier vehicle is a
clear problem.
Impact Type
A score of 5 means a 10% or less chance of serious injury. Data courtesy
of the NHTSA.
The Misnoma
Increasing one's speed by a mere 5mph will negate all the safety benefits
of the best car over the worst car due to the non-linearity of speed:crash energy.
This vital point is omitted from the majority of crash safety coverage in the media.
A human being can withstand 30-40G before serious injuries result and there is a
finite length of crumple zone to dissipate such injury before intrusion into the
cabin becomes inevitable due to the energy impulse of the collision. Past 40mph
the chance of survival against a same-weight car diminishes rapidly, at 56mph
survival is vastly beyond present crash & safety design speeds. The energy at
56mph is approximately 200% greater than at 40mph - not 25% greater.
Vehicle weight is a critical factor in crash survival. A heavy large car with
poor crumple zones leaves the occupants to absorb higher G loadings. A light
euro-box car impacting a heavy large-car will result in the lighter car (and
it's occupants) experiencing a greater change in acceleration than the larger
car. For two equally safe cars on ratings, the larger & heavier car will force
the smaller & lighter car to absorb more of the impact energy which may result
in it's occupants faring worse than statistics may suggest based on purely
impact speed.
G-loadings in racing cars are very different to road cars. Racing cars involve
very linear deceleration through use of honeycomb aluminium & composites, the
decelerations are over long periods through run-off areas or deep tyre walls,
full 6-point 4" web racing harnesses & crash helmets are worn, and declerations
are often momentary as repeated obstacles are being bounced off.
There is no magic to a racing car. If you hit a tree at 100mph and decelerate
to 0mph in 3 feet then the G load experienced is both monumentally large and
over an extremely short duration. Headline G figure is nothing without the
duration over which it is experienced.
To clarify the importance of safety-belt wearing, a 30G impact will involve you
exerting a force of 6,000lbs on the seat-belt. If a seat-belt is not worn you
will exert a force of 6,000lbs on whatever object fate chooses for you. Not
surprisingly even innocent appearing objects become lethal. Thisis particularly
true where rear seat passengers are not wearing a seat-belt and impact the head
of the person seated in front of them - or to the side of them. To quantify 30G
more directly, it is 30 people standing on your shoulders using your skeleton.
Those who come after you so they stand on your shoulders do not do so all once.
Data courtesy of the NHTSA. A score of 5 or below means a 10% or less chance of
serious injury.
Probe does well
Probe/MX6/626 do extremely well on head & chest injury. Leg loads are within
limits although this is one particular area that industry wide needs more work.
For Femur-load, Head-Injury-Criteria (HIC) and Decelerative-G lower = better.
The problem with most vehicles is their construction: steel is a poor choice as
a crushing material in comparison to composites. Composites crush from the point
at which load is applied and not somewhere else along their length like steel,
and so the survival space can be both better understood in design and maintained
during an actual collision. A Corvette which uses both composites & tubular
construction provides an example of using both materials to their optimum,
the ideal eventually being an all composite car such as GM's Autonomy.
Front firewall intrusion is a common occurency in impacts, where steel crushes
at points well behind the point of impact. Intrusion is frequently 20-27cm or
more in a frontal 40%-offset impact at 40mph. An old argument for safety used
to be a 12" spike fitted to a steering-wheel, what drivers & media alike do
not know is that it is fitted - in the footwell.
Intrusion mean femur loads, lower-limb multiple compound fractures, femur
multiple compound fractures, pelvic fractures next to internal organs with
the complex metal jigs & screws through to bone joining everything back
together (if lucky) the result. Thus for any vehicle, wearing a seat-belt
properly and placing the seat back (yet still able to drive safely) is very
beneficial regarding intrusion and also gives the airbag space to deploy.
In driving you have no control over the distance of the vehicle behind you
from your rear bumper. What you do have control over is the distance
of your car to the vehicle in front. Thus if the vehicle behind is
too close, you correspondingly increase your distance from the car in front.
If any event in front then requires you to stop, you have better control
over your survivability in terms of distance to stop.
Adjust your Headrest
The Probe/MX6/626 have integral headrests, however they must be adjusted
high enough to prevent the head disappearing over the top of them.
Adjust the headrest so the users head can not go back over it as would be the
case in a rear impact and also as a user rebounds from the safety belt
& airbag in a frontal impact (whiplash is very common and difficult to treat).
The neck is an extremely weak structure with a lump of heavy bone at its end.
Whiplash can and does kill: as the head rotates backwards the atlas & pivot
on cervical vertebra push through the base of the skull into the brain. More
and more insurance/medical/life-time costs are being caused by whiplash as
other injuries have been decreased. Desperately few cars have strong enough
headrest supports and extremely few people adjust them correctly.
Considering racing car seats, they use extremely strong carbon fibre with high
headrests and now side impact head-catchers, vastly stronger than domestic
car items. The US & Europe crash safety departments need to push harder
for improvements in head-rest safety & user-adjustment-awareness (currently
only one vehicle has headrests remotely strong enough).
Simple Improvements
Some improvements manufacturers could do for car safety is to adopt the use
of honeycomb structures in bumpers (most car bumpers are poor, the Probes bumpers
are actually good, the MX6/626 not as good).
Such honeycomb structures could help protect feet better, and appropriate use
of them is really needed in matching door side-panel construction to the area
of the body it hits in a side-impact (there is just 6" between a person and
over 1300kgs travelling at say 35mph). Consider removing a seat & door and
sitting in a road resting the door at your side with arms outstretched so
it will hit you in the ribs & pelvis and have someone drive at you with a car.
This is the reality beyond the perceived "safety cage" - the sill is too low
and the single floor is corrugated for frontal-impact not side-impact.
Inside the car the MX6/Probe/626 is better than most. However like all cars
the dash area under the steering wheel has an extremely strong panel behind
it of black glass re-inforced plastic nearly 1/4" thick. Removing it and
placing padding doesn't increase noise, but knee-caps & joints will no
longer shatter on impacting it.
1996 Ford Probe |
Drivers side 5 | Passengers side 4 |
| Head IC | Chest Decel | Femur Load (L/R, lb) |
Drivers side | 238 | 34G | 1586 | 987 |
Passenger side | 538 | 45G | 962 | 1527 |
New Audi A6 |
Drivers side 5 | Passengers side 5 |
| Head IC | Chest Decel | Femur Load (L/R, lb) |
Drivers side | 406 | 45G | 1118 | 1410 |
Passenger side | 406 | 45G | 649 | 876 |
96 Nissan 240SX/200SX |
Drivers side 3 | Passengers side 4 |
| Head IC | Chest Decel | Femur Load (L/R, lb) |
Drivers side | 900 | 57G | 197 | 661 |
Passenger side | 404 | 52G | 446 | 456 |
96 BMW 328i |
Drivers side 4 | Passengers side 4 |
| Head IC | Chest Decel | Femur Load (L/R, lb) |
Drivers side | 820 | 48G | 1500 | 1356 |
Passenger side | 506 | 53G | 1023 | 1050 |
95 Volvo 850 4dr |
Drivers side 5 | Passengers side 4 |
| Head IC | Chest Decel | Femur Load (L/R, lb) |
Drivers side | 434 | 43G | 1404 | 1371 |
Passenger side | 421 | 58G | 1093 | 945 |
Last Upload: 31st January, 2002. V1.50a
URL: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/dorothy.bradbury/probemx/p_ws9.htm