Ford Probe, Mazda 626 & MX6 FAQ


Regular Maintenance

Comparative Crash Data on Cars

Comparative Crash Data on cars

    Impact Type
      Cars crashed at 35mph into solid barrier. This is the same as a head-on collision between two identical weight vehicles each doing 35mph (ie, 70mph head-on.) or the same as driving into a parked identical car at 70mph. Impacting in a small car against a heavier vehicle is a clear problem.
    Impact Type
      A score of 5 means a 10% or less chance of serious injury. Data courtesy of the NHTSA.

    The Misnoma
      Increasing one's speed by a mere 5mph will negate all the safety benefits of the best car over the worst car due to the non-linearity of speed:crash energy. This vital point is omitted from the majority of crash safety coverage in the media.

      A human being can withstand 30-40G before serious injuries result and there is a finite length of crumple zone to dissipate such injury before intrusion into the cabin becomes inevitable due to the energy impulse of the collision. Past 40mph the chance of survival against a same-weight car diminishes rapidly, at 56mph survival is vastly beyond present crash & safety design speeds. The energy at 56mph is approximately 200% greater than at 40mph - not 25% greater.

      Vehicle weight is a critical factor in crash survival. A heavy large car with poor crumple zones leaves the occupants to absorb higher G loadings. A light euro-box car impacting a heavy large-car will result in the lighter car (and it's occupants) experiencing a greater change in acceleration than the larger car. For two equally safe cars on ratings, the larger & heavier car will force the smaller & lighter car to absorb more of the impact energy which may result in it's occupants faring worse than statistics may suggest based on purely impact speed.

      G-loadings in racing cars are very different to road cars. Racing cars involve very linear deceleration through use of honeycomb aluminium & composites, the decelerations are over long periods through run-off areas or deep tyre walls, full 6-point 4" web racing harnesses & crash helmets are worn, and declerations are often momentary as repeated obstacles are being bounced off.

      There is no magic to a racing car. If you hit a tree at 100mph and decelerate to 0mph in 3 feet then the G load experienced is both monumentally large and over an extremely short duration. Headline G figure is nothing without the duration over which it is experienced.

      To clarify the importance of safety-belt wearing, a 30G impact will involve you exerting a force of 6,000lbs on the seat-belt. If a seat-belt is not worn you will exert a force of 6,000lbs on whatever object fate chooses for you. Not surprisingly even innocent appearing objects become lethal. Thisis particularly true where rear seat passengers are not wearing a seat-belt and impact the head of the person seated in front of them - or to the side of them. To quantify 30G more directly, it is 30 people standing on your shoulders using your skeleton.

      Those who come after you so they stand on your shoulders do not do so all once.

      Data courtesy of the NHTSA. A score of 5 or below means a 10% or less chance of serious injury.

    Probe does well
      Probe/MX6/626 do extremely well on head & chest injury. Leg loads are within limits although this is one particular area that industry wide needs more work. For Femur-load, Head-Injury-Criteria (HIC) and Decelerative-G lower = better.

      The problem with most vehicles is their construction: steel is a poor choice as a crushing material in comparison to composites. Composites crush from the point at which load is applied and not somewhere else along their length like steel, and so the survival space can be both better understood in design and maintained during an actual collision. A Corvette which uses both composites & tubular construction provides an example of using both materials to their optimum, the ideal eventually being an all composite car such as GM's Autonomy.

      Front firewall intrusion is a common occurency in impacts, where steel crushes at points well behind the point of impact. Intrusion is frequently 20-27cm or more in a frontal 40%-offset impact at 40mph. An old argument for safety used to be a 12" spike fitted to a steering-wheel, what drivers & media alike do not know is that it is fitted - in the footwell.

      Intrusion mean femur loads, lower-limb multiple compound fractures, femur multiple compound fractures, pelvic fractures next to internal organs with the complex metal jigs & screws through to bone joining everything back together (if lucky) the result. Thus for any vehicle, wearing a seat-belt properly and placing the seat back (yet still able to drive safely) is very beneficial regarding intrusion and also gives the airbag space to deploy.

      In driving you have no control over the distance of the vehicle behind you from your rear bumper. What you do have control over is the distance of your car to the vehicle in front. Thus if the vehicle behind is too close, you correspondingly increase your distance from the car in front. If any event in front then requires you to stop, you have better control over your survivability in terms of distance to stop.

    Adjust your Headrest
      The Probe/MX6/626 have integral headrests, however they must be adjusted high enough to prevent the head disappearing over the top of them.

      Adjust the headrest so the users head can not go back over it as would be the case in a rear impact and also as a user rebounds from the safety belt & airbag in a frontal impact (whiplash is very common and difficult to treat). The neck is an extremely weak structure with a lump of heavy bone at its end.

      Whiplash can and does kill: as the head rotates backwards the atlas & pivot on cervical vertebra push through the base of the skull into the brain. More and more insurance/medical/life-time costs are being caused by whiplash as other injuries have been decreased. Desperately few cars have strong enough headrest supports and extremely few people adjust them correctly.

      Considering racing car seats, they use extremely strong carbon fibre with high headrests and now side impact head-catchers, vastly stronger than domestic car items. The US & Europe crash safety departments need to push harder for improvements in head-rest safety & user-adjustment-awareness (currently only one vehicle has headrests remotely strong enough).

    Adjust & Wear your Seatbelt
      Having a correctly adjusted headrest is as important as a correctly adjusted seatbelt: a wrongly adjusted or worn incorrectly seatbelt can slice a person in two. Without a seatbelt a person has negligible chance of survival and may even kill other occupants - airbag or not.

      Too many people in the US still don't wear a seatbelt, an occupant behind another in a vehicle must also wear a seatbelt.

    Simple Improvements
      Some improvements manufacturers could do for car safety is to adopt the use of honeycomb structures in bumpers (most car bumpers are poor, the Probes bumpers are actually good, the MX6/626 not as good).

      Such honeycomb structures could help protect feet better, and appropriate use of them is really needed in matching door side-panel construction to the area of the body it hits in a side-impact (there is just 6" between a person and over 1300kgs travelling at say 35mph). Consider removing a seat & door and sitting in a road resting the door at your side with arms outstretched so it will hit you in the ribs & pelvis and have someone drive at you with a car. This is the reality beyond the perceived "safety cage" - the sill is too low and the single floor is corrugated for frontal-impact not side-impact.

      Inside the car the MX6/Probe/626 is better than most. However like all cars the dash area under the steering wheel has an extremely strong panel behind it of black glass re-inforced plastic nearly 1/4" thick. Removing it and placing padding doesn't increase noise, but knee-caps & joints will no longer shatter on impacting it.

      1996 Ford Probe
      Drivers side 5 Passengers side 4
      Head IC Chest Decel Femur Load (L/R, lb)
      Drivers side 238 34G 1586 987
      Passenger side 538 45G 962 1527

      New Audi A6
      Drivers side 5 Passengers side 5
      Head IC Chest Decel Femur Load (L/R, lb)
      Drivers side 406 45G 1118 1410
      Passenger side 406 45G 649 876

      96 Nissan 240SX/200SX
      Drivers side 3 Passengers side 4
      Head IC Chest Decel Femur Load (L/R, lb)
      Drivers side 900 57G 197 661
      Passenger side 404 52G 446 456

      96 BMW 328i
      Drivers side 4 Passengers side 4
      Head IC Chest Decel Femur Load (L/R, lb)
      Drivers side 820 48G 1500 1356
      Passenger side 506 53G 1023 1050

      95 Volvo 850 4dr
      Drivers side 5 Passengers side 4
      Head IC Chest Decel Femur Load (L/R, lb)
      Drivers side 434 43G 1404 1371
      Passenger side 421 58G 1093 945



    Ford Probe, Mazda 626 & MX6 FAQ

    Last Upload: 31st January, 2002. V1.50a
    URL: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/dorothy.bradbury/probemx/p_ws9.htm