Ford Probe, Mazda 626 & MX6 FAQ


B) Sourcing Components & Regular Maintenance


Engine Architecture

V6 Configurations
    The V6 configuration appears in 1.8, 2.0, 2.25 and 2.5 litre displacements.
    - 2.25V6 - worlds only Miller-Cycle (MC) as opposed to Otto-Cycle engine. The Miller Cycle uses an 8 to 1 compression ratio with 10 to 1 power ratio for improved power & reduced fuel consumption. The MC uses a twin-intercooled Lysholm-screw Autorotor supercharger (world's most compact & most efficient) to deliver 210-230lb/ft at 3500rpm and 0-60 of 7.9secs from the 4-speed ATX. It effectively achieves the power of a 3.2-3.5V6, yet fuel economy of a 2.1V6. The 0-60 time through torque-converter slippage masks the accelerative capability.

    - 2.5V6 - two variations of the 2.5V6 exist, KL for ex-Japan, KL-ZE for within Japan. The KL is a detuned variant of the KL-ZE offering power and fuel economy of a 2.2V6 (based on the 2.0V6 output). The KL-ZE offers 200bhp and achieves up to 94bhp/litre.

    - All V6s - all Normally Aspirated V6s feature a Variable Resonance Intake System (VRIS), the same concept as later used by Porsche on their 3.6 and Ferrari in much more sophisticated form on their V12. VRIS first appeared in Mazda's in their older 158bhp 2.0i-16 UK engine in 1989, it's purpose is to maximise the area under the torque curve rather than peak figures so aiding low-end driveability. In addition, the VRIS aids fuel efficiency and averages of 27-29mpg (Imperial) in urban driving and up to 32-34mpg (Imperial) on the highway readily attained.

    The I4 engines are special derivatives of the Miata & 1.8-I4-235bhp turbo engines. The V6 has been used in the SuperTouring Mazda Xedos6 & 323V6-5dr (Xedos6 floorpan, not related to the 323), and by Ford in 2.0V6 form in Mondeo/Contour. The Mazda V6 is not related to the Duratec engine which lacks a forged crankshaft. The 2.5V6 MX6 raced in several countries successfully. The IMSA 2.5V6 engines produced 430-480bhp from the 2.5V6, the 2.0V6 was 380-420bhp, all in race only form.

Engineering Data

Mean Piston Speed
    - V6 Engines - all-alloy DOHC 24V 60-degree V6 configuration
    - Split Crankcase - as 911 flat-6 offers increased rigidity over traditional bearing-cap solutions for high-rpm capability (7800rpm 2.0V6) and low NVH (winning 1992 German engine award)
    - Bearings - 4-bolt Mains, with a further pair of bolts at each bearing section. Key journals & bearings are oversized regarding width. Bearings are triple-layer heavy duty
    - Crankshaft - Forged, nitrided, triple-lapped, mirror-finished
    - Piston Squirters - Upper bearing journals contain piston oil-squirters to aid cooling
    - Exhaust-Valves - Stainless steel & sodium cooled
    - Pistons - Lightweight to reduce reciprocating mass, piston skirts are moly coated to reduce friction
    - Head Gaskets - Stainless steel is used, with torque-to-yield bolts
    - Stroke - Very short stroke creates low crank angles & low rod/bearing loads

    Engine Dynamic Stress Levels
    o Mean Piston Speed, MPS
    - 2.5V6 MPS = 0.167 * 2.92 * 7000 = 3170 ft/min at 7000rpm
    - 2.0I4 MPS = 0.167 * 3.62 * 6500 = 3929 ft/min at 6500rpm
    - F1 engine MPS = 4519 ft/min at 16,400rpm

    - As a benchmark, MPS
    - under 3,500 ft/min - Good reliability
    - 3,500-4,000 ft/min - Stressing
    - over 4,000 ft/min - Very short lived

    o Bore & Stroke
    - 2.0 Bore*Stroke of 83x92mm (3.62" long stroke)
    - 2.5 Bore*Stroke of 84.5x74.2mm (just 2.92" stroke)
    - For comparison F1 engines have 70x42mm (1.65" stroke)

    o Ring Loadings
    Top-rings must balance high-rpm capability and wear, a thin ring allows high-rpm capability, too thin and wear becomes an issue. With reduced crank angles from a short stroke ring wear is reduced. A 1.5mm ring is beneficial over a 1.0mm ring for high-rpm.

    Maximum-Piston-Acceleration (MPA):
    2.5 top-ring - 1.49mm/0.06"
    - MPA Permitted = 77,000ft/sec^2
    - MPA Experienced = 51,354ft/sec^2 at 7000rpm
    2.0 top-ring - 1.17mm/0.046"
    - MPA Permitted = 105,000ft/sec^2
    - MPA Experienced = 70,157ft/sec^2
    - The BMW M5 in comparison experiences MPA of 90,000ft/sec^2 on a 1.5mm ring.

    Lighter rings create reduced accelerative forces, reduced ring/piston interface overheating and reduced hammering of the piston-ring-groove. Too light and ring longevity is adversely affected.

    MPA = (rpm^2 * stroke"/2189)*(1/2A), A = ratio between rod-length-between-centres to stroke.
    2.0 rod-centre-dist = 135mm; stroke = 92.0mm; A = 1.47
    - MPS-2.0 = (6500^2*3.62/2189)*(1.2*1.47) = 51,354 ft/sec^2

    2.5 rod-centre-dist = 138mm; stroke = 74.2mm; A = 1.87
    - MPS-2.5 = (7500^2*2.92/2189)*(1.2*1.87) = 70,157 ft/sec^2

    Both the 2.5V6 & 2.0I4 engines are engineered for longevity. The 2.5 engine is likely to be the longer lived engine subject to identical maintenance to the 2.0 engine. Mazda V6 engines are assembled entirely by robots, not humans, at the Osaka engine plant in Japan alongside Rotary engines.

    Ford bench testing, with very minor changes, showed the V6 to be capable of continuous running at 8900rpm - well beyond redline 7500rpm.

    SAE paper "SAE920677" covers detailed design of the engine.

Engine Longevity

Long Term Testing

    A USA oil company researched engine longevity using their own oil:

      "After 300,950 miles the Mazda MX6-V6 passed an IM 240 Exhaust Emission Test in Aurora, Colorado, with results well within new car limits. At more than 310,000 miles, the test engine was disassembled for inspection and measurement. No wear was evident on valve stems and guides, main and rod bearings, crankshaft main and rod journals, or cylinder walls. The cylinder hone marks from original factory machining were all clearly evident. While piston skirts showed no wear, piston rings showed an average of only 0.0015" of face wear."

    The V6 rivals the Lexus V8 for longevity, which is unsurprising considering the original application was a Xedos6-2.0V6, Xedos9-2.25/2.5V6 & Sentia rotary luxury lines. Many V6s & I4s have exceeded 350,000 miles, the only failures on one was a Mitsubishi alternator at over 200,000 miles and the pre-Jan-1995 rear calipers on another.

    The replacement for the V6 will come in two forms, a 2.3-DOHC-I4 in the Mazda-6 and a 3.0-DOHC-V6 in a larger saloon. There is of course the innovative 4 door sports car, the RX-8, with the 250-280bhp Renesis rotary engine and potential for a series of rotary sports cars should the market demand. The Renesis engine is a non-turbo rotary engine using side-port exhausts to greatly improve fuel economy, reduce emissions and improve performance.



    Ford Probe, Mazda 626 & MX6 FAQ

    Last Upload: 16th February, 2002. V1.50a
    URL: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/dorothy.bradbury/probemx/p_m18.htm